@article {76961,
	title = {Evaluation of non-traditional modelling techniques for forecasting salmon returns},
	journal = {Fisheries Management and Ecology},
	volume = {22 },
	year = {2015},
	note = {Natural resource managers need to be able to forecast salmon runs, but this can be difficult without enough data to compensate for {\textquotedblleft}potential explanatory variables.{\textquotedblright}  This paper compares three traditional modeling techniques with five non-traditional methods.  The authors used data from 1997 to 2012 for 18 coho salmon and seven fall-run Chinook salmon populations to predict run sizes.  Positive aspects and potential dangers of non-traditional modeling techniques are discussed.},
	month = {2015, Aug.},
	pages = {p.269{\textendash}348},
	keywords = {Alsea River, Beaver Creek, Chinook salmon = Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, Coho salmon = Oncorhynchus kisutch, Coos River, Coquille River, fecundity, Lower Umpqua River, Middle Umpqua River, natural resource management, Necanicum River, Nehalem River, Nestucca River, North Umpqua River, Salmon River, Siletz River, Siuslaw River, Sixes River, South Umpqua River, statistical analysis, Tillamook River, Yaquina River},
	doi = {10.1111/fme.12122},
	author = {McCormick, J.  L. and Falcy, M. R.}
}
@book {11966,
	title = {Biological recovery criteria for the Oregon Coast coho salmon evolutionarily significant unit},
	series = {NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC},
	number = {no.91},
	year = {2008},
	note = {By some metrics such as population persistance or population sustainability, the Salmon River coho salmon population seems to be in trouble. The authors note that this "raises red flags as to the likelihood of persistence of these populations over the next 100 years..." (p.40)},
	month = {2008},
	publisher = {U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries Service, Northwest Fisheries Science Center},
	organization = {U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries Service, Northwest Fisheries Science Center},
	address = {[Seattle, Wa.]},
	keywords = {Alsea River, Beaver Creek, Coho salmon = Oncorhynchus kisutch, Coos Bay, Coquille River, depleted populations, Floras Lake, Lower Umpqua River, Middle Umpqua River, Necanicum River, Nehalem River, Nestucca River, North Umpqua River, population biology, population count, Salmon River, Siletz River, Siltcoos Creek, Siuslaw River, Sixes River, South Umpqua River, statistical analysis, Tahkenitch Creek, Tenmile Creek, Tillamook Bay, Yaquina River},
	url = {https://www.nwfsc.noaa.gov/assets/25/739_08122008_154005_BRCohoTM91Final.pdf},
	author = {Wainwright, Thomas C. and Chilcote, Mark W. and Lawson, Peter W. and Nickelson, Thomas E. and Huntington, Charles W. and Mills, Justin S. and Moore, Kelly M. S. and Reeves, Gordon H. and Stout, Heather A. and Weitkamp, Laurie A.}
}
@article {51266,
	title = {Macroinvertebrate Report: Oregon Coast Coho Evolutionarily Significant Unit (2006-2007):  Final Report},
	year = {2008},
	note = {One way to measure a stream{\textquoteright}s health is to count the aquatic insects in it.  {\textquotedblleft}This report summarizes macroinvertebrate data collected in cooperation with the ODFW in the twenty-one independent coho populations units from 2006-2007. These data were collected by ODFW crews and analyzed by ODEQ staff. Biological integrity, temperature stress and fine sediment stress were evaluated for each of the twenty-one population units.{\textquotedblright} (p.4)   There are good data here.  },
	pages = {34 p.},
	institution = {Oregon. Dept. of Environmental Quality. Laboratory and Environmental Assessment Division,},
	address = {Hillsboro, Or.},
	keywords = {Alsea River, aquatic invertebrates, Beaver Creek, Coho salmon = Oncorhynchus kisutch, Coos Bay, Coquille River, ecosystem health, insects, Lower Umpqua River, Middle Umpqua River, Necanicum River, Nehalem River, Nestucca River, Salmon River, sediment data, sediments, Siletz River, Siuslaw River, South Umpqua River, Tillamook Bay, water temperature, Yachats River, Yaquina River},
	url = {https://library.state.or.us/repository/2009/200902091133141/},
	author = {Hubler, Shannon and Oregon. Dept. of Environmental Quality. Laboratory and Environmental Assessment Division, and Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board,}
}
@article {12111,
	title = {Oregon coastal coho assessment:  Part 1:  Synthesis of the coastal coho ESU assessment ...},
	year = {2005},
	note = {"May 6, 2005" -- date from front cover.  This report is important because it identifies winter habitat for coho ("stream complexity") as the most important limiting factor for the Oregon Coast Evolutionary Significant Unit coho recovery and production.  Other limiting factors include hatchery impacts, water quantity, water quality, and exotic fish species. Identifies viable populations. Distinguishes between populations that can persist when marine and freshwater conditions are unfavorable and populations dependent on reproductive contributions from strays from other basins.  Preliminary analysis "suggests that winter habitat (i.e. stream complexity) is a higher priority for restoring coho populations across the ESU than water quality." (p.20)  For the Salmon River, the most important limiting factors were hatchery impacts, then stream complexity. },
	pages = {69 p.},
	institution = {State of Oregon},
	address = {Salem, Or.},
	keywords = {Alsea River, Beaver Creek, Coho salmon =  Oncorhynchus kisutch, Coos Bay, Coquille Bay, ecosystem health, ecosystem modeling, Floras Lake, habitat restoration, hatcheries, hatchery salmonids, historical, human impacts, introduced species, Lower Umpqua River, Middle Umpqua River, Necanicum River, Nehalem River, Nestucca River, North Umpqua River, reproductive behavior, Salmon River, Siletz River, Siltcoos Lake, Siuslaw River, Sixes River, South Umpqua River, straying, Tahkenitch Lake, Tenmile Creek, Tillamook Bay, water quality, wild salmonids, Yaquina River},
	url = {https://tinyurl.com/wxlu2be},
	author = {Nicholas, Jay and McIntosh, Bruce and Bowles, Ed and Oregon. Watershed Enhancement Board and Oregon. Dept. of Fish and Wildlife,}
}
